Foto 2

Referencias bibliográficas

1. Barry R and Smith AC, The manager’s guide to six sigma in healthcare. Practical tips and tools for improvement. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, 2005.
2. Pexton, C (2000). Measuring Six Sigma Results in Healthcare Industry. In Six Sigma in Healthcare:
3. http//healthcare.isixsigma.com/library/content/ c040623a.asp. Retrieved November 2009.
4. Garcia-Porres J, Ortiz-Posadas MR, Pimentel-Aguilar AB: Lean Six Sigma Applied to a Process Innovation in a Mexican Health Institute’s Imaging Department. Proceedings 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2008; 5125-5128.
5. Becerril- Alquicira and Ortiz-Posadas MR. Improvement of the Health Technology Management Process of the Public Health Services in Morelos Using the Six Sigma Methodology. Proceedings 32nd Annual international Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010; 450-453.
6. De Dios JA, Velázquez A, Núñez A. Algunas reflexiones sobre la calidad en la prestación de los Servicios de Salud. MEDISAN 2001; 5(2): 34-7.
7. Pimentel-Aguilar AB, Aguilar-Adaya MK, Sanchez-Castillo EI, Ortiz-Posadas MR. Improving the Drug Dispensing Process at the National Institute of Respiratory Disease by Appling the Six Sigma Methodology. Proceedings 33nd Annual international Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Washington, USA, 2011; 450-453.
8. "Gone with the wind: Tubes are whisking samples across hospital". Stanford School of Medicine. 2010-01-11. http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2010/january/tubes-0111.html#.html. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
9. Steige H, Junes JD. Evaluation of pneumatic-tube system for delivery of blood specimens. Clin Chem Dec 1971; 17(12): 1160-4.
10. Keshggegian AA, Bull GE. Evaluation of a soft-handling computerized pneumatic tube specimen delivery system. Effects on analytical results and turnaround time. Am J Clin Pathol Apr; 1992; 97(4):535-40.
11. Sheshadri N. The preanalytic phase. An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol, 2000; 113: 429-52.
12. Fernandes CM, Worster A, Eva K, Hill S, McCallum C. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality. J Emerg Nurs 2006; 32(2): 139-43.
13. Howanitz J, Howanitz P. Timeliness is a quality attribute and strategy. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116: 311-5.
14. Plebani M, Zaninotto M. Pneumatic tube delivery systems for patient samples: evidence of quality and quality of evidence. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49(8):1245-6.
15. Treviño GN, Valle A, Fierro H, de la Loza A. Indicadores de Servicios de Salud. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Subdirección General Médica. México. 2000.
16. Secretaría de Salud. Observatorio del Desempeño Hospitalario. 2003-2006 (En línea. Último acceso: abril 2008). http://www.dged.salud.gob.mx.
17. Santos BC, Rodríguez DC. Modulo de estimación de costos hospitalarios. Dirección general de Planeación y Desarrollo en Salud. Secretaria de Salud, 2004.